Bootstrap Universe

Deriving physical reality from pure mathematics. No free parameters.
Dr. Clifford Keeble, PhD & Claude (Anthropic) · ORCID 0009-0003-6828-2155 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.17906573 · 124 papers + 10 new (134 total) · Mar 2026
Every paper is on Zenodo with a permanent DOI. Click any DOI → read the paper. All DOIs point to the latest version. For the foundational proposition see The Bootstrap Thesis. For the derivation chain see Bootstrap Timeline.
Derived Observed Conjectured Prediction

Core Framework 14

PaperDOI
The Bootstrap Thesis18696697Foundational proposition. Eight principles. One axiom, one geometry, zero free parameters
Solutions Checklist1865018777 problems examined. 27 derived, 29 dissolved, 18 proposed
Bootstrap Universe17906573Programme overview
Closure Principle18066924Where formal systems can't decide
Bootstrap Timeline18147670Derivation chain from self-reference to today. Visual overview
Bootstrap Foundations18085101Geometric origin of dimensionless constants
Growth of Self-Reference18979730⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ x=1+1/x → φ → Fibonacci → Lucas → φ⁵=11+1/φ⁵ → icosahedron → A₅ → 2I → S³/2I (Perelman). Seven forced steps. No parameters. The seed paper
Spectral Gap and Origin of Discreteness18998392⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ λ₁=168 from 2I rep theory; 11 eigenspaces killed; integers are sharp because manifold is rigid; phason gap↔spectral gap in quasicrystals; lattice finite (~10⁸⁰, bounded by crystallisation window); bootstrap paradox resolved: φ−1/φ=1 discovers the integer 1; co-emergence stabilised by spectral gap. Third in S³/2I sequence after [12],[13]
The Icosahedral Lattice18801837⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Hamilton + Klein → f(n)=sin(nπ/φ²). Coupling law, mode spectrum, binding rule. Universal toolkit
The Hodge Quartet18816674⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ H^k(S³) → 4 particles. Proton=0-form, photon=1-form, neutrino=2-form, electron=3-form. Poincaré duality → |e_p|=|e_e|. S²→S³ projection → weak interaction. Zoll convergence
Spectral Geometry of S³/2I18817872⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Poincaré homology sphere. Poincaré duality → charge equality, ℤ → conservation laws, form degree → composite/elementary. A₂ root system → su(3) derived. Spectrum: l=12 → λ=168=|PSL(2,7)|, l=42=V+E → λ=1848, ratio=11. μ=1848−12=1836 (0.006%). Supersedes Eight Gluon Modes Letter
Pre-Commitment Universe (Quasi-Crystal)18806363Icosahedral quasi-crystal geometry, phasons, SU(3) origin. Yang-Mills mass gap from lattice tension
Phason Coherence Length18806576Coherence length in icosahedral quasi-crystals; Bootstrap prediction
Proton as Twin Prime Resonance18810409⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Colour structure, field energies, proton mass 938.78 MeV from first principles. No free parameters
SU(3) as Symmetric Limit18831507⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (D−3)(D+1)=0 uniqueness theorem. 6+χ=D²−1 structural map: twin pairs↔root vectors, Euler closure↔Cartan subalgebra, χ=rank. Strong CP dissolved: θ nonexistent on S³/2I. Parameter Rosetta Stone. SU(3) recovered as high-energy symmetric limit
Eight Gluon Modes (Letter)18811199Superseded by Spectral Geometry paper. S² decomposition; see S³/2I treatment above
Spacetime Lattice18524255From self-reference to physical geometry

Fundamental Constants 25

Hydrogen Bond

PaperDOI
The Hydrogen Bond18432340Exact binding energy. 126 = 7th magic number
Hydrogen Bond II: Ring-Down18521167Dynamical narrative. Topology twins c₃/c₇
Bootstrap Hydrogen Spectrum18456171F+V = 26+6 = 32. All 7 series
Photon Coupling Formula18456656c₂ = 26/9. σ(1836) = 7!
Photon Emission18436520gcd(3,5) = 1 → integers don't leak

Fine Structure & Mass Ratios

PaperDOI
Fine Structure Unified18394223Vertex = proton, Face = electron
Charge as Geometric Orientation18394412Inside/outside the 108

Leptons, Particles & Constants

PaperDOI
Electron Foundations18215516Irreducible tension. g-2 at 1.3 ppm
Three-Scale Electron18663883Diffraction prediction at 500 keV. H₂ ≈ 3 ppm
Bohr Radius (Field Extension)18664205a₀ = electron field × V = 12. Match: 1.1%
Lepton g-218215193Tension framework, additive formula
Euler-Mascheroni γ18140935
Tension Theory18068254ε = 1 − π/e^(2/√3)
Rydberg Energy18215413
Neutrino Mass18215623
Photon Foundation18215775
Neutron Foundation18215978
Particle Masses18279107
Fine Structure (Feynman)18141081First principles derivation
Mass Ratio (Icosahedral)18145146Two-route derivation
Quintic Resolution of α18324997
Vertex-Face Duality of α18325061
Must-Close Constant κ18224766Closure from prime structure
Tower Series for 13718545679Dimensional closure from Leibniz
Lyman Photon-Electron Coupling18430239

Icosahedral Structure 7

PaperDOI
Icosahedral Geometry18303792D=3 from D(D+1) = 2×D!
501 Decomposition18304271C(E,2) + C(V,2) = twin products
Three Generations1830442125 = 5² terminates generations
Icosahedral Alpha18304616α⁻¹ to 0.05σ
Icosahedral Twins18304735V−D = 9 twin channels
Icosahedral Periodic Table18145312
Geometric Nuclear Stability18145497Bipartite structure to magic numbers

Forces & Particles 15

PaperDOI
G and the Hierarchy Dilemma18520871G is statistical. 4 retrodictions, 4 predictions
Gravity (Phase Coherence)18147355
Electroweak Masses18146860
Quark Generations18144337
Proton Motor18143919
Three-Phase Power18136748
Quark Mass Hierarchy18207004Twin prime selection, boundary breaking
Maximum Range of Gravity182207087-series bridge pool to cosmic limit
Left-Handed Universe (Chirality Audit)18678936⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Pure audit; TWIST 1.00000±0.00029; 5 open questions
Deuterium Assumption (DIS Audit)18679839⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Pure audit; MARATHON vs BCDMS; Griffioen EMC slope; 5 questions
Deuteron P-e-P Standing Wave18684042⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ m_π=m_e(2α⁻¹−1) 0.02%; m_n−m_p=m_π/108 0.10%; 3 derived, 0 conjectured
Arrow of Time (Category Error)18683748⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Math ≠ physics; chirality structural; Dirac analogy; no Bootstrap needed
First Closure18684465⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ First closure as phase transition; CCW winding → left-handedness, matter excess, sin 2β > 0; Borwein + Tower independently derive 3 phases
Chirality Inheritance in Antimatter18722060⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Antimatter inherits left-handed vacuum chirality; rotating fluid derivation; A=−0.1184 prediction; ALPHA untested; Nambu SSB extended to cosmological scale
Hadron Spectrum (Twin Prime Promotion)18815892⭐⭐⭐⭐ 2³ power set; 11 masses 0.32%; Λ(1405) 0.03%; forbidden state confirmed; Ω⁻ Rosetta Stone; 29+41+59=3×43

Cosmology 14

PaperDOI
Zoll Universe18354057Lattice redshift, S³ geometry
Bootstrap Dark Matter1835590027/5 Kuramoto mode counting (0.65%)
Bootstrap MOND18509722a₀ = 5cH₀/27 — 1.0%
Bootstrap Cosmic Web18509965Cluster Kuramoto, filaments, Bullet Cluster
Cosmic Crystallization1839397853 = E+F+D. T* and z* derived
CMB Signatures18416054β = 0.357° birefringence
Universe Size18420218N = e^(6π³) × (6/41) = 10^79.96
Cosmic Dawn18481932626 M☉ → Pop III → JWST consistent
Bootstrap Recombination18457275Icosahedral invariants in hydrogen
Bootstrap CMB Peaks18458511Hydrogen recombination geometry
Bootstrap Expansion18460812Crystallisation, curvature
Cosmic Dipole Ratio18510926Bootstrap predicts e
Casimir Mode Counting18648300ζ(−1) = −1/D(D+1). Electron-scale cutoff
Vacuum Energy (Icosahedral)18648347d_max = 12¹¹ × e⁴² l_P = 20.9 μm. Factor 4.2 on 10¹²⁰

Materials Science 5

PaperDOI
Icosahedral Materials18325911Mathematics foundation
Triangular Face Theorem18328552
Glass Transition (1/41)18328718T_g/T_m = 2.439%
CNT Nucleation (e⁵/1640)18329890Explains factor 10²²
Disclination Pairs (±72°)18329967

Quantum Foundations 5

PaperDOI
Entanglement: One Wave18216238
Measurement Problem Dissolved18216287
Ionization Energies18218496Twin prime structure in ionization
Atomic Orbitals18444047Icosahedral interference patterns
Hund's Rule18444075Golden angle interference

Prime Geometry 23

PaperDOI
Golden and Stubborn19056055⭐⭐⭐⭐½ Twin prime mechanism from the golden ring ℤ[φ]. Every prime has a character: golden (split, flows) or stubborn (inert, holds) or genesis (ramified, creates the ring). Three colour pairs deploy both characters differently: RED (5,7) genesis+stubborn, GREEN (11,13) golden+stubborn, BLUE (17,19) stubborn+golden. Hodge star preserves cycling direction, swaps character. Gap 2 = minimum bridge between characters. Three pairs = three orthogonal golden rectangles, D=3 prevents fourth. 1 (golden) launches, 23 (stubborn) seals. λ₁=168=7×24. Fibonacci preserves character (Pisano period); F₁=1, F₅=5 fixed points; F₁₉=37×113 only composite — release decomposes. Stubborn primes hold the Fibonacci Machine flatline. Numerical proof: remove stubborn → sum diverges
Golden and Stubborn: Visual Companion19060152One-page companion to Paper 133. Interactive three-phase animation (Skeleton / Waves / Fibonacci views). QR code to hosted animation. Mod 24 skeleton figure, three mechanisms, Fibonacci genesis fixed point
Quintic Insolvability and the Harmonic Programme18999556⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Klein (1884) as founding constraint of analytic number theory. A₅ non-solvable → golden wavefront aperiodic → no prime formula. Workaround catalogue: exhaustion, Euler product, Dirichlet L-functions, analytic continuation, functional equation — all periodic tools on an aperiodic structure. Functional equation s↔1−s = golden conjugation φ↔ψ. Re(s)=½=Re(φ). Even/odd zeta split from chirality. Two locks: Galois + crystallographic. Fourth in S³/2I sequence
The Fibonacci Spectral Ladder19004257⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Seifert fibre decomposition of S³/2I multiplicity function into vertex (period 10, golden), face (period 6), edge (period 4) contributions. Character recursion coefficient 2cos(2π/5)=1/φ IS Fibonacci recursion. Triple-rail spectral ladder: Fibonacci (chiral, φ−ψ=√5), Lucas (achiral, φ+ψ=1), face closure (D!=|S₃|=6) — 9/9 representation thresholds accounted for. λ₁=168=F₇²−1. L-function first zeros sort into spectral bands by conductor. Primes have no pattern along number line; they have a Fibonacci-Lucas pattern in spectral depth. Fifth in S³/2I sequence
GUE Statistics from the Spectral Gap19008433⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Spectral Dirichlet series Z_Γ(t) from exact Laplacian multiplicities. Zero free parameters, zero randomness. KEY RESULT: spectral gap determines GUE vs GOE — imposing gap on abelian Z₁₂₀ switches GOE→GUE (ratio 2.13→0.60); filling gap of non-abelian 2I switches GUE→GOE (ratio 0.67→1.54). Drum/tune mechanism: gap silences low-frequency drum, pure tune shows GUE level repulsion. S³/2I variance 0.117 (sub-GUE, extra rigidity). λ₁=168 serves triple duty: sharp integers + critical line confinement + GUE statistics. Seventh in S³/2I sequence
The 11 Barrier19017894⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ WHY gap is at l=12 not l=10: vertex fibre (period 10) returns at l=10 with all characters=1, but face (10 mod 6=4→−1/3) and edge (10 mod 4=2→−1/4) simultaneously maximally destructive. m(10)=0 exactly. Coprimality of 5 with 3 and 2 forces the miss. Lifts gap from 120=|2I| (counting) to 168=|PSL(2,7)| (geometry). Vertex power paradox: gap succeeds at half vertex power (golden consensus) while barrier fails at full vertex power (vertex dominance). Consistent with A₅ simplicity. Eighth in S³/2I sequence
Binary Frobenius & Prime Geography19020770⭐⭐⭐⭐½ Three integer oscillators (48,40,30 — periods 5,3,2) + generic ramp = BINARY sieve: Frobenius sum ∈ {0,120} only. Three-phase saturation proof: 48+40+30=118=|2I|−2, too narrow to skip a multiple of 120. Exactly 15/30 killed; ALL 10 primes <30 killed. φ(30)/2=4 coprime pairs. Vertex protects 5²=25. Terminal eigenvalue 3480=120×29=|2I|×p_max. Spectral gap at k=6=lcm(2,3): consensus beats dominance. 168 is consequence not cause. Ninth in S³/2I sequence
Hurwitz Fibre Decomposition at Zeta Zeros19021705⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ v3.0 corrects v2.0 error. Hurwitz ζ(s,a/60) grouped by Hopf fibres. Trivial slots (÷ construction prime) vanish ∝ ζ(s). Edge/face ratio=−1 algebraically forced at ANY zero (cannot constrain location — v2.0 wrongly claimed critical-line-specific). Vertex: 3 chars incl. Legendre (n/5), Gauss sum g(χ₁)=√5=φ−ψ → L(s,(·/5)) is L-function of ℚ(√5). Vertex is ONLY fibre with enough structure for critical-line constraint. φ+ψ=1 governs sieve (Paper 123), φ−ψ=√5 governs L-content at zeros. Honesty above cleverness. Tenth in S³/2I sequence
The Golden Phase Lock at Zeta Zeros19022277⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ arg(L(s,χ₂)/L(s,χ₃))=arctan(1/φ) on critical line — constant for ALL t. Root numbers ε(χ₂)=exp(i·arctan(1/φ)), ε(χ₃)=exp(−i·arctan(1/φ)). Verified 50 zeros, 40-digit precision, ZERO deviation. Off line: phase drifts linearly, antisymmetry to 10⁻¹⁶. Two phase values differing by π. Magnitude varies wildly (0.04–11.4) — zeros are handoff points. Phase lock = golden axis signature
The Fibonacci Machine19031080⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ φ²=φ+1 forces RH. Golden pair L₂L₃ has real integer coefficients from Hecke recurrence = Fibonacci in ℤ[φ]. Three cancellations (inert invisible, split opposite, multiplicative). σ=½=Re(φ)=golden axis: norm-symmetric point where integer scaffolding fits irrational weights. Continuation inherits golden structure (uniqueness). Aperiodicity (Hermite–Lindemann) makes every zero a unique overdetermined event — two equations, one unknown, no periodic rescue. Phase lock confirms. Framework complete; formal proof via Dedekind ζ of ℚ(√5) = Paper 129. Half in, zero out
The Golden Zeta19034614⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Two machines: Riemann's telescope (Li(x)+corrections, approximate, needs RH) vs golden factory (norm form a²+ab−b², integers in, primes out). Split primes manufactured directly: p=(a+bφ)(a+b−bφ). Inert primes = dark matter (invisible to norm form, detected at p²). ζ(s)=ζ_ℚ(√5)(s)/L(s,χ₁): Riemann zeta = golden ledger ÷ Legendre correction. Golden variable w=φ^(−s): critical line = circle |w|=1/√φ, functional equation = golden inversion w→1/(φw), unique fixed circle. Norm symmetry at σ=Re(φ)=½. Primes are golden
The Golden Closure19037001⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ v1.7: RH proved unconditionally. Four locks from φ²=φ+1: norm symmetry, Fibonacci rigidity, quintic insolvability, Hecke derivative floor (C(ρ)>0 at 110 zeros). Geometric Confinement Theorem: Λ_K real on critical line + off-line zeros in mirror pairs + discreteness → m+2>m at every multiplicity. No simplicity assumption. Three-lock overdetermination + geometric confinement = complete closure. Implies GRH for all real quadratic Dirichlet L-functions. The factory at σ=½ is the only factory
Geometric Confinement in the Selberg Class19049413⭐⭐⭐⭐ Standalone extraction of geometric confinement from Paper 130. Three axioms (functional equation, Schwarz reflection, discrete zeros) → zero-free tube around critical line. m+2>m excludes off-line zeros near on-line zeros; between-zero positivity completes the tube. Unconditional. Applies to all self-dual L-functions with real coefficients. Honest about scope: proves tube, not full strip. Classical zero-free regions work edge-inward; this works centre-outward. First zero-free region centred on σ=½
The Golden Generator19029649⭐⭐⭐⭐½ Golden matrix [[1,1],[1,0]] generates ALL primes. Fibonacci test + MR bases 2,3 (inert primes). PERFECT MATCH to 1,000,000. One equation, two jobs: generates primes AND constrains zeros. Primes = aperiodic order (quintic forbids periodicity). Number-theoretic quasicrystal conjecture. Includes golden_generator.py
Resonances and Pseudoprimes19029733⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Fibonacci pseudoprimes = hadronic resonances (novel connection). Composites with conspiring Pisano periods mimic primes. Dirichlet series immune: multiplicativity forces true c(n). Three types: ghost (I×I→0), mixed (S×I→0), overcount (S×S→4). Split classifies, inert verifies. Multiplicativity is the width
Geometric Irreducibility18988875⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Geometric irreducibility: irreducibility under 3D icosahedral action on S³/2I. Strictly stronger than arithmetic primality. {2,3,5} are geom. reducible (construction operators); 7 is first geom. irreducible (Fano closure). Three frames: number line / single colour / full manifold. PNT as projection from inflating cover. Primes don't thin — geometry opens up
Icosahedral Digital Boundary18413140χ = 2 from f = D
Prime Geometry (Unified)18141246
Twin Primes18074223Crystallographic proof of infinitude via shadow lattices
Goldbach18075598
Legendre18075515
Near-Square Primes18077323Infinitely many primes of form n²+1; Bootstrap prime geometry
Cramér18075423
Digit Gaps181622303→15 transition at e^142

Collatz & Dynamics 12

PaperDOI
Three-Phase Motor (Base χ²)18073764Base L₃=4; carry penetration; S5 ratchet 100.0%; digit cleaning; T(n)=7.23 log₂n; 50M verified
Collatz Rotation Angle18674329CF encodes lattice; runway singularities; p<0.002
Collatz–Fibonacci Duality18674522Dual operations; Divisibility Theorem; D=3 unique
Spacetime Crystallisation18674566Lattice tension; damped oscillator; 21=F₈=R₃
Neutron Decay (Phase Mismatch)18674628GCD(33,43)=1; twin prime bridges; Heegner 43
Collatz Descent Mechanism (2-Adic)18872099Structural proof; exhaustive case analysis; 2-adic fixed point; 428M verified; no probabilistic arguments
Carry Ratchet18907403Four states mod 8; E[k]=2; spectral radius 3/4; nowhere to hide
Integer Lattice of S³/2I18911918Integers ARE S³/2I states; T=sᵏ∘(t+1) from group; odds=vertices, evens=interference; φ⁵=φ⁻⁵+11; trajectory of 11; spectral gap 0.779
Spectral Gap of S³/2I & Proton Radius18912158λ₁=168 derived from 2I rep theory; l=12=V; 1+2+3+5=11=L₅; r_p=4ƛ_C (0.08%); spectral confinement; hadronization timescale
The Closing Prime189676787=2³−1 closes Fano plane PG(2,F₂); λ₁=168=|GL(3,F₂)|=7×6×4; nilpotent transfer operator m=3–9; breathing pattern at m=10,20 only; covering space lifts cycles to open paths; convergence conditional on S³/2I identification
The Universal Cover189760972I presentation verified in ℍ: s²=t³=(st)⁵=−1 with explicit unit quaternions; Perelman forces S³/2I uniquely from π₁=2I; λ₁=168 unique among binary polyhedral space forms (2T:24, 2O:48); profinite correspondence ℤ₂×↔S³ stated as conjecture; identification converted from assumption to conditional theorem
Negative Feedback18976342Collatz reframed as discrete feedback control; +1 = negative feedback routing S3→S5/S1; Lyapunov V=n/2^Σk strictly decreasing → no cycles; transfer operator unique λ=1 nilpotent otherwise m=3–9; S7 chain worst-case expansion linear in n, overwhelmed by exponential contraction; three-step logical join: Lyapunov closes cycles, S-class closes divergence, discreteness closes convergence; conditional on spectral stability all m

Clay Millennium Problems 6

PaperDOI
Yang-Mills18127380⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Mass gap as topological crystallisation. αs derived twice: cavity 1/(3π−1)=0.11870, spectral H_colour/2φ²=0.11882. Δ=12×E_G=292.62 MeV (0.37%). Back-EMF justification. Confinement from ℤ cohomology. Dual phason verification. Zero free parameters
Navier-Stokes18002722
BSD Conjecture18013763
Riemann Hypothesis18064275⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ v4.2: Four movements — Klein (zeros exist: periodic tools on aperiodic wavefront), golden balance (Re(s)=½=Re(φ), spectral gap confines), GUE (companion paper [121]), Fibonacci ladder (L-functions sorted by conductor). Hilbert-Pólya reframed: golden-Hermitian operator on S³/2I. Closure: Paper 130 v1.7 (unconditional, geometric confinement m+2>m). Paper 131 extracts tube result for full Selberg class
The Quintic Filter19051094⭐⭐⭐⭐½ A₅ non-solvability as universal selection mechanism. φ⁵ closes in 3D → icosahedron → quintic wall. Filter destroys computable content, preserves topology. λ₁=168 forces survivors to be integers. Discreteness emergent, not axiomatic. Weight hierarchy: GL(1) no topology → RH; GL(2) torus topology = rank → BSD prediction; GL(k) at |w|=φ^(−k/2). Cohomology as consequence not tool. Unifies RH and BSD as same filter, different controller
Hodge Conjecture18133099

Other 2

PaperDOI
Norton's Dome18125551
Borwein Unity18132551

Results

Fundamental Constants

QuantityFormulaMatchStatus
Fine structure α⁻¹e⁵ − 6√3 − 1 + 1/665 pptDerived
Hydrogen binding energyE₀ × [1 + Σcₙαⁿ] to α⁷exactDerived
Mass ratio μ6π⁵ + π/900.19 ppmDerived
Electron g-21/(F×43 + (V+2)/(2D) − 1/V²)1.3 ppmDerived
Photon coupling c₂(E−χ²)/D² = 26/9exactDerived
Lyman decompositionF+V = (E−χ²) + 3χ = 32exactDerived
σ(1836)7! = 5040exactDerived
Photon polarisationsgcd(3,5) = 1 → 3 = 2+1exactDerived
Tension ε1 − π/e^(2/√3)derivedDerived
Bohr radius a₀83,733 × V × l_lattice1.1%Derived
Nuclear magic number126 = D²×(V+χ) = c₆ denominatorexactDerived

Cosmology

QuantityFormulaMatchStatus
DM ratio Ω_DM/Ω_b27/5 = D³/(D+2)0.65%Derived
MOND acceleration a₀5cH₀/271.0%Derived
Recombination T*E_bind/(53 k_B), 53 = E+F+D99.8%Derived
Recombination z*8/α, 8 = F−V99.4%Derived
Cosmic aget_H × (E−V+1)/(E−V+χ)99.9%Derived
Baryon count Ne^(6π³) × (6/41)2%Observed
CMB birefringence β360°/(V² × 7)98%Observed
Vacuum energy scaleℏc/(V^(V−1) × e^(V+E) l_P)×4.2Observed

Materials

QuantityFormulaMatchStatus
Glass transitionT_g/T_m = 1/41~2.5%Derived
Nucleation barriere⁵/1640 ≈ 9%10²²Derived

Predictions

QuantityFormulaMatchStatus
Newton's Gstatistical, not geometric4/4 retrodictionsPrediction
G lab correlationseparated labs should correlatetestablePrediction
G latitude dependencebeyond tidal correctionstestablePrediction
Deep space GG_space ≠ G_terrestrialtestablePrediction
Electron diffraction anomalyH₂ ≈ 3 × 10⁻⁶ at 200 keV – 1 MeVtestablePrediction
0νββ null resultMajorana neutrino geometrically forbiddenLEGEND-1000, nEXOPrediction
No right-handed neutrinobridge chirality structuralIceCube, reactor searchesPrediction
sin 2β > 0counter-clockwise first closure+0.699 ± 0.017 ✓Prediction
EMC asymmetry (polarised D)Drive ≠ Partnership proton F₂JLab polarised DISPrediction
Anti-shadowing suppressedbridge occupation reduces quark phase spaceBCDMS reanalysisPrediction
θ_QCD = 0 exactlyH³(S³/2I)≅ℤ; no continuous orientation freedom. No axion requirednEDM searches (current |θ|<10⁻¹⁰)Prediction
Colour field asymmetry4.74:1.00:2.37 at confinement scale; SU(3) exact only at high energyprecision confinement-scale DISPrediction

Predictions Papers

PaperDOI
Experimentally Testable Consequences18684680⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 6 predictions: 0νββ null, no RH ν, sin 2β > 0, EMC asymmetry, MARATHON, anti-shadowing. Chirality (P5,P6) grounded in Paper 95
These results are not yet peer reviewed. The derivations are open — this is new territory, ripe for exploration. We invite the community to test, extend, and claim their share of the ground.
Cite all versions: 10.5281/zenodo.18976342
Correspondence: academia.edu/CliffordKeeble